Skip Navigation

Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 2005 49(1):93-94; doi:10.1093/nass/49.1.93
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tsuchiya, H.
Right arrow Articles by Kamiya, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tsuchiya, H.
Right arrow Articles by Kamiya, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2005 Oxford University Press

Conversion of nucleotide sequence with single-stranded DNA fragment prepared from phagemid DNA

Hiroyuki Tsuchiya1,2,3, Tomoko Sawamura1, Masayuki Uchiyama1, Hideyoshi Harashima1,2 and Hiroyuki Kamiya1,2

1 Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Hokkaido University, Kita-12, Nishi-6, Sapporo, 060-0812, Japan, 2 CREST, Japan Science and Technology, Japan, 3 Graduate School of Medicine, Tottori University, Nishi-machi 36-1, Yonago, Tottori 683-8504, Japan

The correction of a mutated gene is a highly attractive approach for gene therapy. This in vivo mutagenesis method will also be an effective tool in biotechnology. However, the current small fragment homologous replacement (SFHR) method with a heat-denatured double-stranded PCR fragment yielded the low correction efficiency. Single-stranded DNA fragments were prepared from single-stranded phagemid DNAs and tested in a gene correction assay with a Hyg-EGFP fusion gene inactivated by a substitution mutation, as a model target. A 606-nt sense, single-stranded DNA fragment dramatically (12–fold) improved the gene correction efficiency, although the antisense strand showed only minimal correction efficiency. On the other hand, correction of frameshift mutations with the sense single-stranded DNA fragment were 2-3–fold as efficient as that with the PCR fragment. These results suggest that the use of a sense, single-stranded DNA fragment is useful in the SFHR method for the correction of mutated genes.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.